| Date | Time | User | Type | Name | Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 22nd December 2024 | 18:49:19 | remus | ascent | Careless Torque | ascent_dt_start | |
|
Before
None
After
2006-03-01
|
|||||||
| 22 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:29 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | suggested_grade_id | |
|
Before
None
After
38
|
|||||||
| 23 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | ascent_style_id | |
|
Before
None
After
1
|
|||||||
| 24 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | exclude_reason | |
|
Before
None
After
Unclear whether this ascent was fabricated, as with other ascents of his.
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1 +1 @@
-
+Unclear whether this ascent was fabricated, as with other ascents of his.
|
|||||||
| 25 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | climb_id | |
|
Before
None
After
2063
|
|||||||
| 26 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | climber_id | |
|
Before
None
After
470
|
|||||||
| 27 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | ascent_dt_end | |
|
Before
None
After
2005-01-01
|
|||||||
| 28 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | ascent_dt_start | |
|
Before
None
After
2004-12-01
|
|||||||
| 29 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | ascent_type_id | |
|
Before
None
After
2
|
|||||||
| 30 | 18th July 2024 | 06:41:10 | remus | ascent | 8 Ball | exclude_reason_pretty | |
|
Before
None
After
<p>Unclear whether this ascent was fabricated, as with other ascents of his.</p>
|
|||||||
| 31 | 18th June 2024 | 19:26:38 | remus | ascent | Hubble | notes | |
|
Before
In the context of his other claims there is doubt around this ascent, however his belayer [Dan Tounley](/climber/1086/dan-tounley) has been contacted (by [Chris Doyle](/climber/220/chris-doyle)) and has confirmed the ascent:
> Yes, I can confirm Rich done these routes [[Liquid Ambar](/climb/66/liquid-ambar), [Hubble](/climb/5/hubble)] as I belayed him.
Makes me laugh that people are doubting him. I tried to log on to U.K Climbing website when I read about the story but unfortunatly my schools sever wouldn't let me (I am in Thailand). Maybe people will stop doubting him now! Maybe he upset someone, I know he can be an arrogant little twat sometimes!!! [1]
[Simon Lee](/climber/1098/simon-lee) has separately been in touch with Dan to confirm the ascent.
[1] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046)
After
In the context of his other claims there is doubt around this ascent, however his belayer [Dan Tounley](/climber/1086/dan-tounley) has been contacted (by [Chris Doyle](/climber/220/chris-doyle)) and has confirmed the ascent:
> Yes, I can confirm Rich done these routes [[Liquid Ambar](/climb/66/liquid-ambar), [Hubble](/climb/5/hubble)] as I belayed him.
Makes me laugh that people are doubting him. I tried to log on to U.K Climbing website when I read about the story but unfortunatly my schools sever wouldn't let me (I am in Thailand). Maybe people will stop doubting him now! Maybe he upset someone, I know he can be an arrogant little twat sometimes!!! [1]
[Simon Lee](/climber/1098/simon-lee) has separately been in touch with Dan to confirm the ascent.
### References
[1] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -5,4 +5,6 @@
[Simon Lee](/climber/1098/simon-lee) has separately been in touch with Dan to confirm the ascent.
+### References
+
[1] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046)
|
|||||||
| 32 | 18th June 2024 | 19:26:38 | remus | ascent | Hubble | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>In the context of his other claims there is doubt around this ascent, however his belayer <a href="/climber/1086/dan-tounley">Dan Tounley</a> has been contacted (by <a href="/climber/220/chris-doyle">Chris Doyle</a>) and has confirmed the ascent:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Yes, I can confirm Rich done these routes [<a href="/climb/66/liquid-ambar">Liquid Ambar</a>, <a href="/climb/5/hubble">Hubble</a>] as I belayed him.
Makes me laugh that people are doubting him. I tried to log on to U.K Climbing website when I read about the story but unfortunatly my schools sever wouldn't let me (I am in Thailand). Maybe people will stop doubting him now! Maybe he upset someone, I know he can be an arrogant little twat sometimes!!! [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="/climber/1098/simon-lee">Simon Lee</a> has separately been in touch with Dan to confirm the ascent.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046">https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046</a></p>
After
<p>In the context of his other claims there is doubt around this ascent, however his belayer <a href="/climber/1086/dan-tounley">Dan Tounley</a> has been contacted (by <a href="/climber/220/chris-doyle">Chris Doyle</a>) and has confirmed the ascent:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Yes, I can confirm Rich done these routes [<a href="/climb/66/liquid-ambar">Liquid Ambar</a>, <a href="/climb/5/hubble">Hubble</a>] as I belayed him.
Makes me laugh that people are doubting him. I tried to log on to U.K Climbing website when I read about the story but unfortunatly my schools sever wouldn't let me (I am in Thailand). Maybe people will stop doubting him now! Maybe he upset someone, I know he can be an arrogant little twat sometimes!!! [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="/climber/1098/simon-lee">Simon Lee</a> has separately been in touch with Dan to confirm the ascent.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046">https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.msg292046.html#msg292046</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 33 | 9th June 2024 | 21:31:06 | remus | ascent | Hasse-Brandler | ascent_type_id | |
|
Before
3
After
9
|
|||||||
| 34 | 9th June 2024 | 17:20:37 | remus | - | - | exclude_reason | |
|
Before
All ascents widely disputed due to a lack of evidence for any of his hard ascents (mysterious belayers, ascents with no-one else at the crag etc.) and a general unwillingness to corroborate ascents. It is likely that some of his claimed ascents did actually happen but with the current evidence available unpicking fact from fiction seems unlikely.
### References
[1] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html)
[2] [https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419](https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419)
[3] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html)
After
All ascents widely disputed due to a lack of evidence for any of his hard ascents (mysterious belayers, ascents with no-one else at the crag etc.) and a general unwillingness to corroborate ascents. It is likely that some of his claimed ascents did actually happen but with the current evidence available unpicking fact from fiction seems unlikely.
### References
[1] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html)
[2] [https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419](https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419)
[3] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html)
[4] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16327](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16327)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -6,4 +6,6 @@
[2] [https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419](https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419)
-[3] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html)
+[3] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html)
+
+[4] [https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16327](https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16327)
|
|||||||
| 35 | 9th June 2024 | 17:20:37 | remus | - | - | exclude_reason_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>All ascents widely disputed due to a lack of evidence for any of his hard ascents (mysterious belayers, ascents with no-one else at the crag etc.) and a general unwillingness to corroborate ascents. It is likely that some of his claimed ascents did actually happen but with the current evidence available unpicking fact from fiction seems unlikely.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html">https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419">https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html">https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html</a></p>
After
<p>All ascents widely disputed due to a lack of evidence for any of his hard ascents (mysterious belayers, ascents with no-one else at the crag etc.) and a general unwillingness to corroborate ascents. It is likely that some of his claimed ascents did actually happen but with the current evidence available unpicking fact from fiction seems unlikely.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html">https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27176.0.html</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419">https://www.ukclimbing.com/news/2010/12/rich_simpson_-_ukcs_position-59419</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html">https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16602.0.html</a></p>
<p>[4] <a href="https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16327">https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,16327</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 36 | 26th February 2024 | 08:31:29 | remus | ascent | Action Directe | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/">https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html">https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html</a></p>
After
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/">https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html">https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://www.thebmc.co.uk/action-man">https://www.thebmc.co.uk/action-man</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 37 | 26th February 2024 | 08:31:29 | remus | ascent | Action Directe | notes | |
|
Before
### References
[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/](https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/)
[2] [https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html](https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html)
After
### References
[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/](https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/)
[2] [https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html](https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html)
[3] [https://www.thebmc.co.uk/action-man](https://www.thebmc.co.uk/action-man)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/](https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/)
-[2] [https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html](https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html)
+[2] [https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html](https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html)
+
+[3] [https://www.thebmc.co.uk/action-man](https://www.thebmc.co.uk/action-man)
|
|||||||
| 38 | 26th February 2024 | 08:27:23 | remus | ascent | Action Directe | notes | |
|
Before
### References
[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/](https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/)
After
### References
[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/](https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/)
[2] [https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html](https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
### References
-[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/](https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/)
+[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/](https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/)
+
+[2] [https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html](https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html)
|
|||||||
| 39 | 26th February 2024 | 08:27:23 | remus | ascent | Action Directe | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/">https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/</a></p>
After
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/">https://www.instagram.com/p/B_5YoPZj3Jm/</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html">https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/rich-simpson-makes-6th-ascent-of-action-directe.html</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 40 | 30th November 2022 | 15:16:53 | remus | - | - | - | |
|
Before
None
After
None
|
|||||||