| Name | Type | # Changes | Last Updated | First Updated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Six Degrees Project | climb | 27 | 20th February 2026 | 20th November 2025 |
| 2 | https://open.spotify.com/episode/5EREAaZGQcasxpoY6oDXor | media | 19 | 3rd March 2026 | 4th February 2026 |
| 3 | https://www.instagram.com/p/DQB9O8UCnLH/ | media | 18 | 8th January 2026 | 8th January 2026 |
| 4 | Distillery Project | climb | 17 | 3rd March 2026 | 4th February 2026 |
| 5 | Jack Palmieri's ascent of Last Wave Goodbye | ascent | 17 | 8th January 2026 | 8th January 2026 |
| 6 | Aidan Roberts | climber | 16 | 26th February 2026 | 19th November 2025 |
| 7 | Duality of Man | climb | 15 | 9th February 2026 | 26th January 2026 |
| 8 | https://www.instagram.com/p/BlIE1w1D4-4/ | media | 15 | 19th February 2026 | 18th February 2026 |
| 9 | https://www.instagram.com/p/CVxr19WLZRL/ | media | 15 | 9th February 2026 | 9th February 2026 |
| 10 | https://www.instagram.com/p/DHysylUSwH1/ | media | 15 | 20th November 2025 | 20th November 2025 |
| Date | Time | User | Type | Name | Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 181 | 20th February 2026 | 17:05:10 | baz9 | ascent | Nacho Sánchez's ascent of Crisis | suggested_grade_id | |
|
Before
42
After
179
|
|||||||
| 182 | 20th February 2026 | 17:01:43 | baz9 | media | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo | missing_right_to_reproduce | |
|
Before
None
After
false
|
|||||||
| 183 | 20th February 2026 | 17:01:43 | baz9 | media | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo | url | |
|
Before
None
After
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo
|
|||||||
| 184 | 20th February 2026 | 17:01:43 | baz9 | media | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo | embed_code | |
|
Before
None
After
<div class="video-wrapper"><iframe class="embed-responsive-item" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bRT9fvNicqo" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
|
|||||||
| 185 | 20th February 2026 | 17:01:42 | baz9 | ascent | Nacho Sánchez's ascent of Crisis | suggested_grade_id | |
|
Before
None
After
42
|
|||||||
| 186 | 20th February 2026 | 17:01:42 | baz9 | ascent | Nacho Sánchez's ascent of Crisis | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/nacho-sanchez-frees-his-crisis-8c-at-crevillente.html">https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/nacho-sanchez-frees-his-crisis-8c-at-crevillente.html</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo</a></p>
After
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/nacho-sanchez-frees-his-crisis-8c-at-crevillente.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/nacho-sanchez-frees-his-crisis-8c-at-crevillente.html</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRT9fvNicqo</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 187 | 20th February 2026 | 16:57:33 | baz9 | climb | Gioia | notes | |
|
Before
A contender for the first 8C+.
Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.
After a couple of repeats from [Adam Ondra](/climber/467/adam-ondra) and [Nalle Hukkataival](/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival), [Daniel Woods](/climber/516/daniel-woods) and [Dave Graham](/climber/503/dave-graham) came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:
> After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.
> Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.
> The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.
> However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]
After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.
### References
[1] [https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/](https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/)
[2] [https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/](https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/)
After
A contender for the first 8C+.
Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.
After a couple of repeats from [Adam Ondra](/climber/467/adam-ondra) and [Nalle Hukkataival](/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival), [Daniel Woods](/climber/516/daniel-woods) and [Dave Graham](/climber/503/dave-graham) came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:
> After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.
> Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.
> The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.
> However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]
After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.
### References
[1] [https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/](https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/)
[2] [https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/](https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/)
[3] [https://www.8a.nu/news/gioia-controversy-based-on-a-misunderstanding](https://www.8a.nu/news/gioia-controversy-based-on-a-misunderstanding)
Diff
--- before
|
|||||||
| 188 | 20th February 2026 | 16:57:33 | baz9 | climb | Gioia | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>A contender for the first 8C+.</p>
<p>Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.</p>
<p>After a couple of repeats from <a href="/climber/467/adam-ondra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Ondra</a> and <a href="/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nalle Hukkataival</a>, <a href="/climber/516/daniel-woods" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Woods</a> and <a href="/climber/503/dave-graham" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dave Graham</a> came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.</p>
<p>Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.</p>
<p>The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.</p>
<p>However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/</a></p>
After
<p>A contender for the first 8C+.</p>
<p>Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.</p>
<p>After a couple of repeats from <a href="/climber/467/adam-ondra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Ondra</a> and <a href="/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nalle Hukkataival</a>, <a href="/climber/516/daniel-woods" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Woods</a> and <a href="/climber/503/dave-graham" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dave Graham</a> came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.</p>
<p>Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.</p>
<p>The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.</p>
<p>However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://www.8a.nu/news/gioia-controversy-based-on-a-misunderstanding" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.8a.nu/news/gioia-controversy-based-on-a-misunderstanding</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 189 | 20th February 2026 | 16:53:29 | baz9 | climb | La Teoría del Todo | crag_location_breadcrumb_pretty | |
|
Before
None
After
<a href="/crags/location/Spain" class="text-muted">Spain</a> / <a href="/crags/location/Spain/Catalonia" class="text-muted">Catalonia</a> / <a href="/crags/location/Spain/Catalonia/Tarragona" class="text-muted">Tarragona</a>
|
|||||||
| 190 | 20th February 2026 | 16:53:29 | baz9 | climb | La Teoría del Todo | ukc_url | |
|
Before
None
After
https://www.ukclimbing.com/logbook/crags/siurana_-_valley-1728/teoria_de_todo-710622
|
|||||||
| 191 | 20th February 2026 | 16:53:29 | baz9 | climb | La Teoría del Todo | crag_id | |
|
Before
None
After
1728
|
|||||||
| 192 | 20th February 2026 | 16:53:29 | baz9 | climb | La Teoría del Todo | crag_name | |
|
Before
None
After
Siurana
|
|||||||
| 193 | 20th February 2026 | 16:53:29 | baz9 | climb | La Teoría del Todo | crag_location_breadcrumb | |
|
Before
None
After
Spain / Catalonia / Tarragona
|
|||||||
| 194 | 20th February 2026 | 16:46:33 | baz9 | ascent | Jonatan Flor's ascent of La Teoría del Todo | suggested_grade_id | |
|
Before
None
After
40
|
|||||||
| 195 | 20th February 2026 | 16:46:18 | baz9 | ascent | Jonatan Flor's ascent of La Teoría del Todo | ascent_style_id | |
|
Before
None
After
1
|
|||||||
| 196 | 20th February 2026 | 16:46:18 | baz9 | ascent | Jonatan Flor's ascent of La Teoría del Todo | climber_id | |
|
Before
None
After
499
|
|||||||
| 197 | 20th February 2026 | 16:46:18 | baz9 | ascent | Jonatan Flor's ascent of La Teoría del Todo | climb_id | |
|
Before
None
After
5797
|
|||||||
| 198 | 20th February 2026 | 16:46:18 | baz9 | ascent | Jonatan Flor's ascent of La Teoría del Todo | notes | |
|
Before
None
After
### References
[1] [https://www.desnivel.com/bulder/jonatan-flor-repite-la-teoria-del-todo-en-albarracin-y-la-deja-en-8b-plus/](https://www.desnivel.com/bulder/jonatan-flor-repite-la-teoria-del-todo-en-albarracin-y-la-deja-en-8b-plus/)
Diff
--- before
|
|||||||
| 199 | 20th February 2026 | 16:46:18 | baz9 | ascent | Jonatan Flor's ascent of La Teoría del Todo | ascent_dt_end | |
|
Before
None
After
2018-09-24
|
|||||||
| 200 | 20th February 2026 | 16:46:18 | baz9 | ascent | Jonatan Flor's ascent of La Teoría del Todo | ascent_type_id | |
|
Before
None
After
2
|
|||||||