Change Log for Couilles de Mammouth

Overview

Total Changes

31

First Change

4th Dec 2023

Last Change

22nd Mar 2024

Log

Date Time User Type Name Attribute
1 22nd March 2024 19:45:36 remus ascent Jacopo Larcher notes_pretty
Before
<p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/</a></p>
After
<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/</a></p>
2 22nd March 2024 19:45:36 remus ascent Jacopo Larcher notes
Before
[https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
After
### References [1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ -[https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/) +### References + +[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
3 21st March 2024 22:10:56 remus ascent James Pearson notes
Before
[https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
After
### References [1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ -[https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/) +### References + +[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
4 21st March 2024 22:10:56 remus ascent James Pearson notes_pretty
Before
<p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/</a></p>
After
<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/</a></p>
5 4th December 2023 19:39:29 remus - - notes_pretty
Before
<p>The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson">James Pearson</a> did describe it as follows:</p> <blockquote> <p>It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant @fierroequip tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1]</p> </blockquote> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1</a></p>
After
<p>The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson">James Pearson</a> did describe it as follows:</p> <blockquote> <p>It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant <a href="https://www.instagram.com/fierroequip/?img_index=1">@fierroequip</a> tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1]</p> </blockquote> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1</a></p>
6 4th December 2023 19:39:29 remus - - notes
Before
The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as follows: > It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant @fierroequip tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1] ### References [1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1)
After
The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as follows: > It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant [@fierroequip](https://www.instagram.com/fierroequip/?img_index=1) tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1] ### References [1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1)
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as follows: -> It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant @fierroequip tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1] +> It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant [@fierroequip](https://www.instagram.com/fierroequip/?img_index=1) tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1] ### References
7 4th December 2023 19:38:28 remus - - notes
Before
The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as 7c+ or 8a with some marginal gear.
After
The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as follows: > It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant @fierroequip tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1] ### References [1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1)
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,7 @@ -The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as 7c+ or 8a with some marginal gear. +The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as follows: + +> It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant @fierroequip tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1] + +### References + +[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1)
8 4th December 2023 19:38:28 remus - - notes_pretty
Before
<p>The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson">James Pearson</a> did describe it as 7c+ or 8a with some marginal gear.</p>
After
<p>The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson">James Pearson</a> did describe it as follows:</p> <blockquote> <p>It’s somewhere between 7c+ and 8a/+ climbing above a couple of bits of specialist gear. One being a brilliant @fierroequip tensioned sky-hook; the other was a filed down black tricam in a shallow pocket that we thought was “50% sure to hold” (meaning: it’s 50% sure to fail!)… The hook is quite good and protects the first half, you then place the tri-cam from a ground fall position, and climb a 6 move crux (very slopey and delicate moves). If the tri-cam holds (it might) you’ll be fine, but if it rips (it will do one day) you are going to… well… it won’t be pretty! [1]</p> </blockquote> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/?img_index=1</a></p>
9 4th December 2023 18:20:42 remus - - notes_pretty
Before
None
After
<p>The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson">James Pearson</a> did describe it as 7c+ or 8a with some marginal gear.</p>
10 4th December 2023 18:20:42 remus - - notes
Before
None
After
The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as 7c+ or 8a with some marginal gear.
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1 @@ - +The grade is a guess as the first and second ascentionists did not offer a grade. However [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) did describe it as 7c+ or 8a with some marginal gear.
11 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson ascent_style_id
Before
None
After
1
12 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson ascent_dt_end
Before
None
After
2024-01-01
13 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson ascent_dt_start
Before
None
After
2023-12-01
14 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson ascent_type_id
Before
None
After
1
15 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson notes_pretty
Before
None
After
<p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/</a></p>
16 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson notes
Before
None
After
[https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1 @@ - +[https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/](https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/)
17 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson climb_id
Before
None
After
2920
18 4th December 2023 18:18:33 remus ascent James Pearson climber_id
Before
None
After
153
19 4th December 2023 18:17:33 remus ascent Jacopo Larcher ascent_style_id
Before
None
After
1
20 4th December 2023 18:17:33 remus ascent Jacopo Larcher notes_pretty
Before
None
After
<p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/">https://www.instagram.com/p/C0cFAfdNY8H/</a></p>

Page 1 >