ben_sandi

	Country	Contributions	Between	Climbers	Crags	Climbs	Ascents
1	USA	1526	20th November 2025 – 4th November 2026	48	20	88	98
2	Australia	767	27th September 2025 – 29th June 2026	6	38	61	33
3	United Kingdom	625	19th November 2025 – 4th November 2026	34	14	24	49
4	Switzerland	308	24th January 2026 – 4th November 2026	6	3	14	38
5	France	300	6th January 2026 – 4th November 2026	15	3	12	34
6	Austria	210	12th November 2025 – 22nd June 2026	5	2	8	22
7	Italy	163	18th November 2025 – 2nd November 2026	9	3	12	12
8	Pakistan	118	11th April 2026 – 26th April 2026	0	0	1	7
9	Spain	105	20th February 2026 – 16th May 2026	5	0	10	11
10	Germany	103	3rd February 2026 – 26th June 2026	7	0	7	10

	Date	Time	User	Type	Name	Attribute
2241	14th May 2026	11:54:04 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Pride of Place	crag_name
Before `None` After `Lower Yosemite Falls`
2242	14th May 2026	11:54:04 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Pride of Place	crag_id
Before `None` After `34272`
2243	14th May 2026	11:42:52 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Pride of Place	crag_name
Before `Yosemite Bouldering` After `None`
2244	14th May 2026	11:42:52 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Pride of Place	crag_id
Before `5090` After `None`
2245	14th May 2026	11:23:40 UTC	ben_sandi	crag	140 Intersection	Other Name
Before `None` After `130`
2246	14th May 2026	11:23:24 UTC	ben_sandi	crag	140 Intersection	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<p>Intersection of the 120 & 140.</p>`
2247	14th May 2026	11:23:24 UTC	ben_sandi	crag	140 Intersection	notes
Before `None` After `Intersection of the 120 & 140.` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1 @@ - +Intersection of the 120 & 140.`
2248	14th May 2026	11:17:29 UTC	ben_sandi	crag	Curry Village Boulders	Other Name
Before `None` After `Leconte`
2249	14th May 2026	11:10:09 UTC	ben_sandi	crag	Yosemite Bouldering	redirect_crag_id
Before `None` After `2600`
2250	14th May 2026	11:09:24 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Pride of Place	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<p>Yosemite </p>`
2251	14th May 2026	11:09:24 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Pride of Place	notes
Before `None` After `Yosemite` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1 @@ - +Yosemite`
2252	13th May 2026	21:47:24 UTC	ben_sandi	crag	Hartland Quay	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] Some history about the crag on pg.4 <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>`
2253	13th May 2026	21:47:24 UTC	ben_sandi	crag	Hartland Quay	notes
Before `None` After `### References [1] Some history about the crag on pg.4 [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ - +### References + +[1] Some history about the crag on pg.4 [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)`
2254	13th May 2026	21:42:54 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p> After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from <a href="/climber/141/stuart-littlefair" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stu Littlefair</a> and <a href="/climber/202/rob-sutton" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rob Sutton</a> who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Pearson</a> and <a href="/climber/300/keith-bradbury" rel="noopener noreferrer">Keith Bradbury</a> made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
2255	13th May 2026	21:42:54 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from [Stu Littlefair](/climber/141/stuart-littlefair) and [Rob Sutton](/climber/202/rob-sutton) who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) and [Keith Bradbury](/climber/300/keith-bradbury) made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. +> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from [Stu Littlefair](/climber/141/stuart-littlefair) and [Rob Sutton](/climber/202/rob-sutton) who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > -> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] +> When [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) and [Keith Bradbury](/climber/300/keith-bradbury) made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.
2256	13th May 2026	21:41:52 UTC	ben_sandi	climber	Stuart Littlefair	Other Name
Before `None` After `Stu`
2257	13th May 2026	21:41:28 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">[Simon] Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p> After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
2258	13th May 2026	21:41:28 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. +> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]
2259	13th May 2026	21:39:38 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p> After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">[Simon] Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
2260	13th May 2026	21:39:38 UTC	ben_sandi	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. +> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Badges

Contributions

Posts

62

76

113

6752

1

13

Contributions Map

Contributions by Country

Recent Contributions

< Page 113 >