baz9

	Country	Contributions	Between	Climbers	Crags	Climbs	Ascents
1	USA	1507	20th November 2025 – 30th June 2026	47	20	87	97
2	Australia	767	27th September 2025 – 29th June 2026	6	38	61	33
3	United Kingdom	576	19th November 2025 – 8th July 2026	33	14	22	43
4	France	264	6th January 2026 – 28th June 2026	14	3	12	31
5	Switzerland	257	24th January 2026 – 10th July 2026	6	3	12	33
6	Austria	210	12th November 2025 – 22nd June 2026	5	2	8	22
7	Italy	129	18th November 2025 – 29th May 2026	9	3	11	10
8	Pakistan	118	11th April 2026 – 26th April 2026	0	0	1	7
9	Spain	105	20th February 2026 – 16th May 2026	5	0	10	11
10	Germany	103	3rd February 2026 – 26th June 2026	7	0	7	10

	Date	Time	User	Type	Name	Attribute
1921	14th May 2026	11:23:24 UTC	baz9	crag	140 Intersection	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<p>Intersection of the 120 & 140.</p>`
1922	14th May 2026	11:17:29 UTC	baz9	crag	Curry Village Boulders	Other Name
Before `None` After `Leconte`
1923	14th May 2026	11:10:09 UTC	baz9	crag	Yosemite Bouldering	redirect_crag_id
Before `None` After `2600`
1924	14th May 2026	11:09:24 UTC	baz9	climb	Pride of Place	notes
Before `None` After `Yosemite` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1 @@ - +Yosemite`
1925	14th May 2026	11:09:24 UTC	baz9	climb	Pride of Place	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<p>Yosemite </p>`
1926	13th May 2026	21:47:24 UTC	baz9	crag	Hartland Quay	notes
Before `None` After `### References [1] Some history about the crag on pg.4 [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ - +### References + +[1] Some history about the crag on pg.4 [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)`
1927	13th May 2026	21:47:24 UTC	baz9	crag	Hartland Quay	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] Some history about the crag on pg.4 <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>`
1928	13th May 2026	21:42:54 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p> After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from <a href="/climber/141/stuart-littlefair" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stu Littlefair</a> and <a href="/climber/202/rob-sutton" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rob Sutton</a> who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Pearson</a> and <a href="/climber/300/keith-bradbury" rel="noopener noreferrer">Keith Bradbury</a> made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
1929	13th May 2026	21:42:54 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from [Stu Littlefair](/climber/141/stuart-littlefair) and [Rob Sutton](/climber/202/rob-sutton) who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) and [Keith Bradbury](/climber/300/keith-bradbury) made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. +> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from [Stu Littlefair](/climber/141/stuart-littlefair) and [Rob Sutton](/climber/202/rob-sutton) who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > -> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] +> When [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) and [Keith Bradbury](/climber/300/keith-bradbury) made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.
1930	13th May 2026	21:41:52 UTC	baz9	climber	Stuart Littlefair	Other Name
Before `None` After `Stu`
1931	13th May 2026	21:41:28 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">[Simon] Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p> After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
1932	13th May 2026	21:41:28 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. +> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]
1933	13th May 2026	21:39:38 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. +> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]
1934	13th May 2026	21:39:38 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p> After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">[Simon] Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
1935	13th May 2026	21:38:56 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p> After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
1936	13th May 2026	21:38:56 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] +Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable. + ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)
1937	13th May 2026	21:36:52 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes_pretty
Before `None` After <blockquote> <p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p> <p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p> </blockquote> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>
1938	13th May 2026	21:36:52 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	notes
Before `None` After > The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. > > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] ### References [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,7 @@ - +> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out. +> +> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1] + +### References + +[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)
1939	13th May 2026	21:34:23 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	Currently Unclimbable
Before `None` After `1`
1940	13th May 2026	21:34:08 UTC	baz9	climb	Ache Ball (pre-break)	climb_name
Before `Ache Ball` After `Ache Ball (pre-break)`

Before

None

After

<p>Intersection of the 120 & 140.</p>

Before

None

After

Leconte

Before

None

After

2600

Before

None

After

Yosemite

Diff

--- before

+++ after

@@ -1 +1 @@

-
+Yosemite

Before

None

After

<p>Yosemite </p>

Before

None

After

### References

[1] Some history about the crag on pg.4  [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Diff

--- before

+++ after

@@ -1 +1,3 @@

-
+### References

+

+[1] Some history about the crag on pg.4  [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Before

None

After

<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] Some history about the crag on pg.4  <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

Before

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

After

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from <a href="/climber/141/stuart-littlefair" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stu Littlefair</a> and <a href="/climber/202/rob-sutton" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rob Sutton</a> who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When <a href="/climber/153/james-pearson" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Pearson</a> and <a href="/climber/300/keith-bradbury" rel="noopener noreferrer">Keith Bradbury</a> made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

Before

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

After

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from [Stu Littlefair](/climber/141/stuart-littlefair) and [Rob Sutton](/climber/202/rob-sutton) who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) and [Keith Bradbury](/climber/300/keith-bradbury) made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Diff

--- before

+++ after

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@

-> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.

+> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from [Stu Littlefair](/climber/141/stuart-littlefair) and [Rob Sutton](/climber/202/rob-sutton) who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.

 >

-> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

+> When [James Pearson](/climber/153/james-pearson) and [Keith Bradbury](/climber/300/keith-bradbury) made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

 

 Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

Before

None

After

Stu

Before

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">[Simon] Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

After

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simon Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

Before

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

After

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Diff

--- before

+++ after

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@

-> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.

+> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [Simon Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.

 >

 > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Before

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

After

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Diff

--- before

+++ after

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@

-> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.

+> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to [[Simon] Young](/climber/1755/simon-young) when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.

 >

 > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Before

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

After

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to <a href="/climber/1755/simon-young" rel="noopener noreferrer">[Simon] Young</a> when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

Before

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

After

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

Before

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

After

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Diff

--- before

+++ after

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@

 >

 > When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

 

+Over the years, hold breakages have left the boulder no longer climbable.

+

 ### References

 

 [1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Before

None

After

<blockquote>
<p>The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.</p>
<p>When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf</a></p>

Before

None

After

> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.
>
> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

### References

[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Diff

--- before

+++ after

@@ -1 +1,7 @@

-
+> The jewel in the crown, and for some time the hardest boulder problem on the Culm coast, went to Young when he climbed the obvious line on the low cave just north of the hotel, which was initially spotted by Quinn. A few sessions of work and the brutally powerful and technical steep arête of Ache Ball was born. This saw early repeats from Stu Littlefair and Rob Sutton who confirmed the 8A grade and quality, leading to it becoming the problem of the crag, and one that visiting climbers sought out.

+>

+> When James Pearson and Keith Bradbury made a visit in 2005 Pearson took advantage of a very low beach and added a low start, naming it “Aching Balls”. Controversially, the pair suggested that this rated 7C+, and the original around 7C. Since then, more repeats have meant that the grade of Ache Ball has settled around 7C+. [1]

+

+### References

+

+[1] [https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf](https://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/HartlandBouldering/Hartland_Miniguide_v3web.pdf)

Before

None

After

1

Before

Ache Ball

After

Ache Ball (pre-break)

Badges

Contributions

Posts

0

0

71

6423

0

13

Contributions Map

Contributions by Country

Recent Contributions

< Page 97 >