Mono

	Country	Contributions	Between	Climbers	Crags	Climbs	Ascents
1	United Kingdom	11177	22nd May 2025 – 11th October 2026	117	13	586	1083
2	France	3432	22nd May 2025 – 29th September 2026	32	13	173	326
3	USA	1774	30th July 2025 – 20th September 2026	26	56	167	88
4	Japan	1478	19th July 2025 – 14th August 2026	14	25	107	73
5	Spain	319	31st July 2025 – 14th August 2026	3	9	35	13
6	Switzerland	229	31st July 2025 – 9th August 2026	2	5	21	15
7	New Zealand	216	19th August 2025 – 14th August 2026	1	1	17	13
8	Canada	170	10th September 2025 – 14th August 2026	1	9	25	3
9	Italy	166	12th August 2025 – 16th August 2026	2	7	19	7
10	Germany	151	8th November 2025 – 6th August 2026	4	6	10	5

	Date	Time	User	Type	Name	Attribute
13361	4th October 2025	20:29:37 UTC	Mono	ascent	Chris Gore's ascent of Linden	climb_id
Before `None` After `863`
13362	4th October 2025	20:29:37 UTC	Mono	ascent	Chris Gore's ascent of Linden	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<p>First onsight ascent</p>`
13363	4th October 2025	20:29:37 UTC	Mono	ascent	Chris Gore's ascent of Linden	ascent_type_id
Before `None` After `1`
13364	4th October 2025	20:29:37 UTC	Mono	ascent	Chris Gore's ascent of Linden	notes
Before `None` After `First onsight ascent` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1 @@ - +First onsight ascent`
13365	4th October 2025	20:29:37 UTC	Mono	ascent	Chris Gore's ascent of Linden	climber_id
Before `None` After `659`
13366	4th October 2025	20:23:29 UTC	Mono	climb	The Great Crack	notes_pretty
Before <p>Strangely, the guidebook author changed the name to 'Right Eliminate' despite <a href="/climber/612/joe-brown">Joe Brown</a> naming it The Great Crack and the former name stuck for a long time.</p> <p>There has been some controversy about the use of chockstones on the route, with various chockstones making an appearance through the routes lifetime. [1]</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] Letter in <em>On The Edge</em> Issue 141, October 2004</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear OTE, </p> <p>I'm writing this letter to alert the off-line climbing community to a debate which has raged on-line on <a href="https://www.ukclimbing.com/">UKClimbing</a> for the last 10 days, (nearly 900 postings on the subject to date). Passions have been inflamed, emails exchanged, friends divided, enemies created - all because I took a stone out of a crack.</p> <p>In preparation for a forthcoming trip to Yosemite, I led Right Eliminate, an off-width crack at <a href="/crag/21/curbar-edge">Curbar Edge</a> , for the first time. A chock- stone at two-thirds height in the route doubled as an (almost!) unavoidable hold and a runner. It also hid the best (natural) hold on the route. Afterwards I reflected on how the chockstone detracted from, and compromised, one of the best offwitdth cracks in the country.</p> <p>On the UKClimbing forum, I suggested removing the chockstone. It was quickly clear that there was both support and opposition for such an action. Being unconvinced by the arguments against, I removed the chockstone on a trial basis. Re-leading the route a few days later confirmed its greatly improved quality and only slightly greater difficulty.</p> <p>Graded E3, Right Eliminate is one of the few pure offwidth cracks in the country and is visible from some distance. First led in 1951 by <a href="/climber/612/joe-brown">Joe Brown</a>, the route was only protectable with chockstones, whereas nowadays it can be well protected with a couple of large cams. The chockstone was presumably placed on abseil by Joe or one of his mates [ed. this is not the case.]. However, its additional use as a hold meant that Right Eliminate was effectively climbed with a point of aid. Nevertheless, it was an outstanding achievement for the time. Latterly Right Eliminate's status as an iconic route was ensured by its inclusion in Extreme Rock and with such guidebook descriptions as 'the energy expended on each ascent could light Sheffield for a week' and 'striking terror into the hearts of stick insects everywhere'.</p> <p>In the 1980s <a href="/climber/1118/paul-mitchell">Paul Mitchell</a> removed some lower chockstones and re-led the route, managing to somehow contort his way past the key chockstone, without using it for aid. However, this intriguing piece of climbing history was not common knowledge or recorded in the 1985 or 1991 guidebook and the purist style of Paul's ascent has not been widely imitated, if at all.</p> <p>Reporting my trial removal of the chock- stone on UKClimbing has resulted in intense debate (both pro and anti). Sadly this debate has sometimes spilled over into personal abuse with the UKClimbing moderators having to step in to remove some particularly objection-able posts. The main schism appears to be ethics/aesthetics, versus history/tradition. I've climbed on grit for 20 years, including new routes, and am mindful of tradition and history. Yet, I am convinced that a strikingly pure, challenging and compelling crack of rare quality should not be cluttered and obstructed with a piece of rubble however historically interesting.</p> <p>Anyone who has done the route will have grappled with the chockstone as it swivelled on its axis when pulled on. Not only was this trashing the crack each time a climber hung and threaded it, but its potential to pop out or crumble as a hold or runner increased as well. Admittedly it may have popped tomorrow or in 50 years time but the ease with which I lifted it out suggested that if Right Eliminate had received the traffic of more popular routes in the vicinity the chockstone would have disappeared in a dangerous way years ago.</p> <p>Finally, I would once again emphasise that my removal of the chockstone was always on a trial basis. It can be returned to its wrongful(?) place if the majority opinion is that this is the right thing to do. Or there may be other solutions... I would encourage off-line readers to respond to OTE as the online community has had our fair say. I would encourage readers even more to go out and climb this now flawless line. I don't know how this story is going to end but it has certainly challenged a lot of people, including myself, to re-examine our priorities and opinions.</p> <p><a href="/climber/1098/simon-lee">Simon Lee</a>, Sheffield </p> </blockquote> After <p>Strangely, the guidebook author changed the name to 'Right Eliminate' despite <a href="/climber/612/joe-brown">Joe Brown</a> naming it The Great Crack and the former name stuck for a long time.</p> <p>There has been some controversy about the use of chockstones on the route, with various chockstones making an appearance through the routes lifetime. [1]</p> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] Letter in <em>On The Edge</em> Issue 141, October 2004</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear OTE, </p> <p>I'm writing this letter to alert the off-line climbing community to a debate which has raged on-line on <a href="https://www.ukclimbing.com/">UKClimbing</a> for the last 10 days, (nearly 900 postings on the subject to date). Passions have been inflamed, emails exchanged, friends divided, enemies created - all because I took a stone out of a crack.</p> <p>In preparation for a forthcoming trip to Yosemite, I led Right Eliminate, an off-width crack at <a href="/crag/21/curbar-edge">Curbar Edge</a> , for the first time. A chock- stone at two-thirds height in the route doubled as an (almost!) unavoidable hold and a runner. It also hid the best (natural) hold on the route. Afterwards I reflected on how the chockstone detracted from, and compromised, one of the best offwitdth cracks in the country.</p> <p>On the UKClimbing forum, I suggested removing the chockstone. It was quickly clear that there was both support and opposition for such an action. Being unconvinced by the arguments against, I removed the chockstone on a trial basis. Re-leading the route a few days later confirmed its greatly improved quality and only slightly greater difficulty.</p> <p>Graded E3, Right Eliminate is one of the few pure offwidth cracks in the country and is visible from some distance. First led in 1951 by <a href="/climber/612/joe-brown">Joe Brown</a>, the route was only protectable with chockstones, whereas nowadays it can be well protected with a couple of large cams. The chockstone was presumably placed on abseil by Joe or one of his mates [ed. this is not the case.]. However, its additional use as a hold meant that Right Eliminate was effectively climbed with a point of aid. Nevertheless, it was an outstanding achievement for the time. Latterly Right Eliminate's status as an iconic route was ensured by its inclusion in Extreme Rock and with such guidebook descriptions as 'the energy expended on each ascent could light Sheffield for a week' and 'striking terror into the hearts of stick insects everywhere'.</p> <p>In the 1980s <a href="/climber/1118/paul-mitchell">Paul Mitchell</a> removed some lower chockstones and re-led the route, managing to somehow contort his way past the key chockstone, without using it for aid. However, this intriguing piece of climbing history was not common knowledge or recorded in the 1985 or 1991 guidebook and the purist style of Paul's ascent has not been widely imitated, if at all.</p> <p>Reporting my trial removal of the chock- stone on UKClimbing has resulted in intense debate (both pro and anti). Sadly this debate has sometimes spilled over into personal abuse with the UKClimbing moderators having to step in to remove some particularly objection-able posts. The main schism appears to be ethics/aesthetics, versus history/tradition. I've climbed on grit for 20 years, including new routes, and am mindful of tradition and history. Yet, I am convinced that a strikingly pure, challenging and compelling crack of rare quality should not be cluttered and obstructed with a piece of rubble however historically interesting.</p> <p>Anyone who has done the route will have grappled with the chockstone as it swivelled on its axis when pulled on. Not only was this trashing the crack each time a climber hung and threaded it, but its potential to pop out or crumble as a hold or runner increased as well. Admittedly it may have popped tomorrow or in 50 years time but the ease with which I lifted it out suggested that if Right Eliminate had received the traffic of more popular routes in the vicinity the chockstone would have disappeared in a dangerous way years ago.</p> <p>Finally, I would once again emphasise that my removal of the chockstone was always on a trial basis. It can be returned to its wrongful(?) place if the majority opinion is that this is the right thing to do. Or there may be other solutions... I would encourage off-line readers to respond to OTE as the online community has had our fair say. I would encourage readers even more to go out and climb this now flawless line. I don't know how this story is going to end but it has certainly challenged a lot of people, including myself, to re-examine our priorities and opinions.</p> <p><a href="/climber/1098/simon-lee">Simon Lee</a>, Sheffield </p> </blockquote> <p><a href="/climber/612/joe-brown">Joe Brown</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Someone told me there was rumour had it that we had dropped chockstones down the crack. Well you couldn't even get into a place where you could drop chockstones down because the crack doesn't go to the top of the crag, anyway that was total bollocks. And I'm pretty sure that the one chockstone that was, was less than halfway up, and this was already there anyway. We didn't put any others in. And now, when I talked to him I said when you do that, you're doing it with camming devices?' and he said 'yeah, I said "and do you push those up in front of you?' He said 'yeah, everyone does, I said, 'well you're not leading it then, 'I said you're on a top rope if you do that.'</p> </blockquote> <p>‘Peak Rock’, p.83</p>
13367	4th October 2025	20:23:29 UTC	Mono	climb	The Great Crack	notes
Before Strangely, the guidebook author changed the name to 'Right Eliminate' despite [Joe Brown](/climber/612/joe-brown) naming it The Great Crack and the former name stuck for a long time. There has been some controversy about the use of chockstones on the route, with various chockstones making an appearance through the routes lifetime. [1] ### References [1] Letter in On The Edge Issue 141, October 2004 > Dear OTE, > I'm writing this letter to alert the off-line climbing community to a debate which has raged on-line on [UKClimbing](https://www.ukclimbing.com/) for the last 10 days, (nearly 900 postings on the subject to date). Passions have been inflamed, emails exchanged, friends divided, enemies created - all because I took a stone out of a crack. > In preparation for a forthcoming trip to Yosemite, I led Right Eliminate, an off-width crack at [Curbar Edge](/crag/21/curbar-edge) , for the first time. A chock- stone at two-thirds height in the route doubled as an (almost!) unavoidable hold and a runner. It also hid the best (natural) hold on the route. Afterwards I reflected on how the chockstone detracted from, and compromised, one of the best offwitdth cracks in the country. > On the UKClimbing forum, I suggested removing the chockstone. It was quickly clear that there was both support and opposition for such an action. Being unconvinced by the arguments against, I removed the chockstone on a trial basis. Re-leading the route a few days later confirmed its greatly improved quality and only slightly greater difficulty. > Graded E3, Right Eliminate is one of the few pure offwidth cracks in the country and is visible from some distance. First led in 1951 by [Joe Brown](/climber/612/joe-brown), the route was only protectable with chockstones, whereas nowadays it can be well protected with a couple of large cams. The chockstone was presumably placed on abseil by Joe or one of his mates [ed. this is not the case.]. However, its additional use as a hold meant that Right Eliminate was effectively climbed with a point of aid. Nevertheless, it was an outstanding achievement for the time. Latterly Right Eliminate's status as an iconic route was ensured by its inclusion in Extreme Rock and with such guidebook descriptions as 'the energy expended on each ascent could light Sheffield for a week' and 'striking terror into the hearts of stick insects everywhere'. > In the 1980s [Paul Mitchell](/climber/1118/paul-mitchell) removed some lower chockstones and re-led the route, managing to somehow contort his way past the key chockstone, without using it for aid. However, this intriguing piece of climbing history was not common knowledge or recorded in the 1985 or 1991 guidebook and the purist style of Paul's ascent has not been widely imitated, if at all. > Reporting my trial removal of the chock- stone on UKClimbing has resulted in intense debate (both pro and anti). Sadly this debate has sometimes spilled over into personal abuse with the UKClimbing moderators having to step in to remove some particularly objection-able posts. The main schism appears to be ethics/aesthetics, versus history/tradition. I've climbed on grit for 20 years, including new routes, and am mindful of tradition and history. Yet, I am convinced that a strikingly pure, challenging and compelling crack of rare quality should not be cluttered and obstructed with a piece of rubble however historically interesting. > Anyone who has done the route will have grappled with the chockstone as it swivelled on its axis when pulled on. Not only was this trashing the crack each time a climber hung and threaded it, but its potential to pop out or crumble as a hold or runner increased as well. Admittedly it may have popped tomorrow or in 50 years time but the ease with which I lifted it out suggested that if Right Eliminate had received the traffic of more popular routes in the vicinity the chockstone would have disappeared in a dangerous way years ago. > Finally, I would once again emphasise that my removal of the chockstone was always on a trial basis. It can be returned to its wrongful(?) place if the majority opinion is that this is the right thing to do. Or there may be other solutions... I would encourage off-line readers to respond to OTE as the online community has had our fair say. I would encourage readers even more to go out and climb this now flawless line. I don't know how this story is going to end but it has certainly challenged a lot of people, including myself, to re-examine our priorities and opinions. > [Simon Lee](/climber/1098/simon-lee), Sheffield After Strangely, the guidebook author changed the name to 'Right Eliminate' despite [Joe Brown](/climber/612/joe-brown) naming it The Great Crack and the former name stuck for a long time. There has been some controversy about the use of chockstones on the route, with various chockstones making an appearance through the routes lifetime. [1] ### References [1] Letter in On The Edge Issue 141, October 2004 > Dear OTE, > I'm writing this letter to alert the off-line climbing community to a debate which has raged on-line on [UKClimbing](https://www.ukclimbing.com/) for the last 10 days, (nearly 900 postings on the subject to date). Passions have been inflamed, emails exchanged, friends divided, enemies created - all because I took a stone out of a crack. > In preparation for a forthcoming trip to Yosemite, I led Right Eliminate, an off-width crack at [Curbar Edge](/crag/21/curbar-edge) , for the first time. A chock- stone at two-thirds height in the route doubled as an (almost!) unavoidable hold and a runner. It also hid the best (natural) hold on the route. Afterwards I reflected on how the chockstone detracted from, and compromised, one of the best offwitdth cracks in the country. > On the UKClimbing forum, I suggested removing the chockstone. It was quickly clear that there was both support and opposition for such an action. Being unconvinced by the arguments against, I removed the chockstone on a trial basis. Re-leading the route a few days later confirmed its greatly improved quality and only slightly greater difficulty. > Graded E3, Right Eliminate is one of the few pure offwidth cracks in the country and is visible from some distance. First led in 1951 by [Joe Brown](/climber/612/joe-brown), the route was only protectable with chockstones, whereas nowadays it can be well protected with a couple of large cams. The chockstone was presumably placed on abseil by Joe or one of his mates [ed. this is not the case.]. However, its additional use as a hold meant that Right Eliminate was effectively climbed with a point of aid. Nevertheless, it was an outstanding achievement for the time. Latterly Right Eliminate's status as an iconic route was ensured by its inclusion in Extreme Rock and with such guidebook descriptions as 'the energy expended on each ascent could light Sheffield for a week' and 'striking terror into the hearts of stick insects everywhere'. > In the 1980s [Paul Mitchell](/climber/1118/paul-mitchell) removed some lower chockstones and re-led the route, managing to somehow contort his way past the key chockstone, without using it for aid. However, this intriguing piece of climbing history was not common knowledge or recorded in the 1985 or 1991 guidebook and the purist style of Paul's ascent has not been widely imitated, if at all. > Reporting my trial removal of the chock- stone on UKClimbing has resulted in intense debate (both pro and anti). Sadly this debate has sometimes spilled over into personal abuse with the UKClimbing moderators having to step in to remove some particularly objection-able posts. The main schism appears to be ethics/aesthetics, versus history/tradition. I've climbed on grit for 20 years, including new routes, and am mindful of tradition and history. Yet, I am convinced that a strikingly pure, challenging and compelling crack of rare quality should not be cluttered and obstructed with a piece of rubble however historically interesting. > Anyone who has done the route will have grappled with the chockstone as it swivelled on its axis when pulled on. Not only was this trashing the crack each time a climber hung and threaded it, but its potential to pop out or crumble as a hold or runner increased as well. Admittedly it may have popped tomorrow or in 50 years time but the ease with which I lifted it out suggested that if Right Eliminate had received the traffic of more popular routes in the vicinity the chockstone would have disappeared in a dangerous way years ago. > Finally, I would once again emphasise that my removal of the chockstone was always on a trial basis. It can be returned to its wrongful(?) place if the majority opinion is that this is the right thing to do. Or there may be other solutions... I would encourage off-line readers to respond to OTE as the online community has had our fair say. I would encourage readers even more to go out and climb this now flawless line. I don't know how this story is going to end but it has certainly challenged a lot of people, including myself, to re-examine our priorities and opinions. > [Simon Lee](/climber/1098/simon-lee), Sheffield [Joe Brown](/climber/612/joe-brown): > Someone told me there was rumour had it that we had dropped chockstones down the crack. Well you couldn't even get into a place where you could drop chockstones down because the crack doesn't go to the top of the crag, anyway that was total bollocks. And I'm pretty sure that the one chockstone that was, was less than halfway up, and this was already there anyway. We didn't put any others in. And now, when I talked to him I said when you do that, you're doing it with camming devices?' and he said 'yeah, I said "and do you push those up in front of you?' He said 'yeah, everyone does, I said, 'well you're not leading it then, 'I said you're on a top rope if you do that.' ‘Peak Rock’, p.83 Diff --- before +++ after @@ -24,4 +24,9 @@ > Finally, I would once again emphasise that my removal of the chockstone was always on a trial basis. It can be returned to its wrongful(?) place if the majority opinion is that this is the right thing to do. Or there may be other solutions... I would encourage off-line readers to respond to OTE as the online community has had our fair say. I would encourage readers even more to go out and climb this now flawless line. I don't know how this story is going to end but it has certainly challenged a lot of people, including myself, to re-examine our priorities and opinions. -> [Simon Lee](/climber/1098/simon-lee), Sheffield +> [Simon Lee](/climber/1098/simon-lee), Sheffield + +[Joe Brown](/climber/612/joe-brown): +> Someone told me there was rumour had it that we had dropped chockstones down the crack. Well you couldn't even get into a place where you could drop chockstones down because the crack doesn't go to the top of the crag, anyway that was total bollocks. And I'm pretty sure that the one chockstone that was, was less than halfway up, and this was already there anyway. We didn't put any others in. And now, when I talked to him I said when you do that, you're doing it with camming devices?' and he said 'yeah, I said "and do you push those up in front of you?' He said 'yeah, everyone does, I said, 'well you're not leading it then, 'I said you're on a top rope if you do that.' + +‘Peak Rock’, p.83
13368	4th October 2025	20:20:24 UTC	Mono	ascent	Joe Brown's ascent of Great Slab	ascent_style_id
Before `3` After `4`
13369	4th October 2025	20:20:24 UTC	Mono	ascent	Joe Brown's ascent of Great Slab	notes
Before `None` After `Nat Allen: >He had a go and got to the very delicate move. He had a really good go; he could have got across to the ledge, but he daren't. Then Wilf [White] had a top rope on it. The next week-end, Joe led it. He went straight for it and did it. ### References [1] Peak Rock, p.83` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,6 @@ - +Nat Allen: +>He had a go and got to the very delicate move. He had a really good go; he could have got across to the ledge, but he daren't. Then Wilf [White] had a top rope on it. The next week-end, Joe led it. He went straight for it and did it. + +### References + +[1] Peak Rock, p.83`
13370	4th October 2025	20:20:24 UTC	Mono	ascent	Joe Brown's ascent of Great Slab	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<p>Nat Allen:</p> <blockquote> <p>He had a go and got to the very delicate move. He had a really good go; he could have got across to the ledge, but he daren't. Then Wilf [White] had a top rope on it. The next week-end, Joe led it. He went straight for it and did it.</p> </blockquote> <h3>References</h3> <p>[1] Peak Rock, p.83</p>`
13371	4th October 2025	20:10:21 UTC	Mono	ascent	Andy Pollitt's ascent of Scritto's Republic	Ascent #
Before `None` After `3`
13372	4th October 2025	20:10:20 UTC	Mono	ascent	Andy Pollitt's ascent of Scritto's Republic	climber_id
Before `None` After `488`
13373	4th October 2025	20:10:20 UTC	Mono	ascent	Andy Pollitt's ascent of Scritto's Republic	ascent_style_id
Before `None` After `1`
13374	4th October 2025	20:10:20 UTC	Mono	ascent	Andy Pollitt's ascent of Scritto's Republic	climb_id
Before `None` After `5813`
13375	4th October 2025	20:10:20 UTC	Mono	ascent	Andy Pollitt's ascent of Scritto's Republic	ascent_type_id
Before `None` After `1`
13376	4th October 2025	19:46:19 UTC	Mono	ascent	Alastair Robertson's ascent of Judge Jules	Ascent #
Before `None` After `2`
13377	4th October 2025	19:46:19 UTC	Mono	ascent	Alastair Robertson's ascent of Judge Jules	ascent_style_id
Before `None` After `1`
13378	4th October 2025	19:46:19 UTC	Mono	ascent	Alastair Robertson's ascent of Judge Jules	climb_id
Before `None` After `6131`
13379	4th October 2025	19:46:19 UTC	Mono	ascent	Alastair Robertson's ascent of Judge Jules	climber_id
Before `None` After `3349`
13380	4th October 2025	19:46:19 UTC	Mono	ascent	Alastair Robertson's ascent of Judge Jules	ascent_dt_end
Before `None` After `2010-01-01`

Badges

Contributions

Posts

4

4

93

23238

1

27

Contributions Map

Contributions by Country

Recent Contributions

< Page 669 >