remus

	Country	Contributions	Between	Climbers	Crags	Summits	Climbs	Ascents
1	United Kingdom	61432	14th November 2023 – 8th November 2026	1800	711	0	3142	5083
2	USA	25581	14th November 2023 – 6th November 2026	818	182	2	859	2421
3	France	12391	14th November 2023 – 4th November 2026	272	126	1	553	1042
4	Switzerland	9695	14th November 2023 – 2nd November 2026	79	43	1	311	1126
5	Spain	8822	15th November 2023 – 4th November 2026	92	76	0	459	927
6	Italy	4902	16th November 2023 – 6th November 2026	120	59	0	189	377
7	South Africa	3688	16th November 2023 – 5th November 2026	12	35	0	128	401
8	Canada	3363	16th November 2023 – 1st November 2026	67	21	3	110	283
9	Germany	3190	16th November 2023 – 27th October 2026	120	48	0	103	225
10	Austria	2659	16th November 2023 – 24th October 2026	76	26	0	105	226

	Date	Time	User	Type	Name	Attribute
83121	7th January 2026	17:05:58 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	instagram_url
Before `None` After `https://www.instagram.com/ohhhzane/`
83122	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_flag
Before `None` After `🇮🇹`
83123	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_membership
Before `None` After `italian`
83124	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_name
Before `None` After `Italy`
83125	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_id
Before `None` After `18`
83126	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	nationality
Before `None` After `IT`
83127	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	gender
Before `None` After `false`
83128	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	climber_name
Before `None` After `Davide Zane`
83129	7th January 2026	15:29:09 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes_pretty
Before <p><a href="/climber/1240/bernard-newman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bernard Newman</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h3>British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change?</h3> <p>The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing.</p> <p>However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game.</p> </blockquote> After <blockquote> <h3>British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change?</h3> <p>The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing.</p> <p>However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. - <a href="/climber/1240/bernard-newman" rel="noopener noreferrer">B.C.N</a></p> </blockquote>
83130	7th January 2026	15:29:09 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes
Before [Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. After > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. - [B.C.N](/climber/1240/bernard-newman) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ -[Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): - > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. -E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. +E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. - [B.C.N](/climber/1240/bernard-newman)
83131	7th January 2026	15:28:30 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes_pretty
Before `None` After <p><a href="/climber/1240/bernard-newman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bernard Newman</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h3>British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change?</h3> <p>The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing.</p> <p>However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game.</p> </blockquote>
83132	7th January 2026	15:28:30 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes
Before `None` After [Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,8 @@ - +[Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): + +> ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? + +> The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. + +> However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. +E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game.
83133	7th January 2026	15:27:29 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	Contributor
Before `None` After `Al Phizacklea`
83134	7th January 2026	15:26:24 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	Ascent #
Before `None` After `1`
83135	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	ascent_dt_end
Before `None` After `1991-01-01`
83136	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	ascent_dt_start
Before `None` After `1990-01-01`
83137	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	ascent_type_id
Before `None` After `1`
83138	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	notes_pretty
Before `None` After `<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <em>Mountain</em> Issue 134 (1990), page 11 <a href="/library/11317/mountain-134" rel="noopener noreferrer">/library/11317/mountain-134</a></p>`
83139	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	notes
Before `None` After `### References [1] Mountain Issue 134 (1990), page 11 [/library/11317/mountain-134](/library/11317/mountain-134)` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ - +### References + +[1] Mountain Issue 134 (1990), page 11 [/library/11317/mountain-134](/library/11317/mountain-134)`
83140	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	ascent_style_id
Before `None` After `7`

Badges

Contributions

Posts

7

1141

5376

223599

232

232

Contributions Map

Contributions by Country

Recent Contributions

< Page 4157 >