| Country | Contributions | Between | Climbers | Crags | Summits | Climbs | Ascents | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Kingdom | 61406 | 14th November 2023 – 4th November 2026 | 1799 | 711 | 0 | 3142 | 5081 |
| 2 | USA | 25550 | 14th November 2023 – 4th November 2026 | 816 | 182 | 2 | 859 | 2417 |
| 3 | France | 12391 | 14th November 2023 – 4th November 2026 | 272 | 126 | 1 | 553 | 1042 |
| 4 | Switzerland | 9695 | 14th November 2023 – 2nd November 2026 | 79 | 43 | 1 | 311 | 1126 |
| 5 | Spain | 8822 | 15th November 2023 – 4th November 2026 | 92 | 76 | 0 | 459 | 927 |
| 6 | Italy | 4881 | 16th November 2023 – 4th November 2026 | 120 | 59 | 0 | 188 | 376 |
| 7 | South Africa | 3686 | 16th November 2023 – 27th October 2026 | 12 | 35 | 0 | 128 | 401 |
| 8 | Canada | 3363 | 16th November 2023 – 1st November 2026 | 67 | 21 | 3 | 110 | 283 |
| 9 | Germany | 3190 | 16th November 2023 – 27th October 2026 | 120 | 48 | 0 | 103 | 225 |
| 10 | Austria | 2659 | 16th November 2023 – 24th October 2026 | 76 | 26 | 0 | 105 | 226 |
| Date | Time | User | Type | Name | Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77361 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | media | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pPSD-faqFQ | url | |
|
Before
None
After
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pPSD-faqFQ
|
|||||||
| 77362 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | ascent_dt_end | |
|
Before
None
After
2026-02-10
|
|||||||
| 77363 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | ascent_dt_start | |
|
Before
None
After
2026-02-10
|
|||||||
| 77364 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | ascent_type_id | |
|
Before
None
After
2
|
|||||||
| 77365 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
None
After
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pPSD-faqFQ" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pPSD-faqFQ</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 77366 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | notes | |
|
Before
None
After
### References
[1] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pPSD-faqFQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pPSD-faqFQ)
Diff
--- before
|
|||||||
| 77367 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | ascent_style_id | |
|
Before
None
After
1
|
|||||||
| 77368 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | climb_id | |
|
Before
None
After
7085
|
|||||||
| 77369 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:21 UTC | remus | ascent | Caleb Franchere's ascent of The Serpentine Line | climber_id | |
|
Before
None
After
2338
|
|||||||
| 77370 | 13th February 2026 | 06:46:04 UTC | remus | climb | The Serpentine Line | eight_a_nu_url | |
|
Before
None
After
https://www.8a.nu/crags/bouldering/united-states/ponderosa/sectors/upper-deck-2y4lb/routes/the-serpentine-line
|
|||||||
| 77371 | 13th February 2026 | 06:44:55 UTC | remus | climb | The Serpentine Line | climb_type | |
|
Before
None
After
2
|
|||||||
| 77372 | 13th February 2026 | 06:44:55 UTC | remus | climb | The Serpentine Line | grade_id | |
|
Before
None
After
39
|
|||||||
| 77373 | 13th February 2026 | 06:44:55 UTC | remus | climb | The Serpentine Line | climb_name | |
|
Before
None
After
The Serpentine Line
|
|||||||
| 77374 | 13th February 2026 | 05:14:57 UTC | remus | climb | Gioia | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.</p>
<p>After a couple of repeats from <a href="/climber/467/adam-ondra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Ondra</a> and <a href="/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nalle Hukkataival</a>, <a href="/climber/516/daniel-woods" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Woods</a> and <a href="/climber/503/dave-graham" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dave Graham</a> came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.</p>
<p>Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.</p>
<p>The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.</p>
<p>However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/</a></p>
After
<p>A contender for the first 8C+.</p>
<p>Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.</p>
<p>After a couple of repeats from <a href="/climber/467/adam-ondra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Ondra</a> and <a href="/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nalle Hukkataival</a>, <a href="/climber/516/daniel-woods" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Woods</a> and <a href="/climber/503/dave-graham" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dave Graham</a> came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.</p>
<p>Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.</p>
<p>The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.</p>
<p>However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/</a></p>
<p>[2] <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 77375 | 13th February 2026 | 05:14:57 UTC | remus | climb | Gioia | notes | |
|
Before
Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.
After a couple of repeats from [Adam Ondra](/climber/467/adam-ondra) and [Nalle Hukkataival](/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival), [Daniel Woods](/climber/516/daniel-woods) and [Dave Graham](/climber/503/dave-graham) came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:
> After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.
> Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.
> The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.
> However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]
After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.
### References
[1] [https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/](https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/)
[2] [https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/](https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/)
After
A contender for the first 8C+.
Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.
After a couple of repeats from [Adam Ondra](/climber/467/adam-ondra) and [Nalle Hukkataival](/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival), [Daniel Woods](/climber/516/daniel-woods) and [Dave Graham](/climber/503/dave-graham) came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:
> After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.
> Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.
> The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.
> However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]
After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.
### References
[1] [https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/](https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/)
[2] [https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/](https://web.archive.org/web/20160930201429/https://theburrowfiles.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/varazze-journals-part-1/)
Diff
--- before
|
|||||||
| 77376 | 12th February 2026 | 23:07:59 UTC | remus | climb | Gioia | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>Gioia was initially put up at 8C by Christiano Core, however, Adam Ondra suggested an upgrade to 8C+ when he did the second ascent of the boulder. If confirmed this upgrade would make Gioia a contender for the first 8C+ in the world, however, no future ascensionists have corroborated the 8C+ grade.</p>
<p>Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.</p>
<p>After a couple of repeats from <a href="/climber/467/adam-ondra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Ondra</a> and <a href="/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nalle Hukkataival</a>, <a href="/climber/516/daniel-woods" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Woods</a> and <a href="/climber/503/dave-graham" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dave Graham</a> came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.</p>
<p>Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.</p>
<p>The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.</p>
<p>However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/</a></p>
After
<p>Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.</p>
<p>After a couple of repeats from <a href="/climber/467/adam-ondra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Ondra</a> and <a href="/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nalle Hukkataival</a>, <a href="/climber/516/daniel-woods" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Woods</a> and <a href="/climber/503/dave-graham" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dave Graham</a> came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.</p>
<p>Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.</p>
<p>The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.</p>
<p>However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 77377 | 12th February 2026 | 23:07:59 UTC | remus | climb | Gioia | notes | |
|
Before
Gioia was initially put up at 8C by Christiano Core, however, Adam Ondra suggested an upgrade to 8C+ when he did the second ascent of the boulder. If confirmed this upgrade would make Gioia a contender for the first 8C+ in the world, however, no future ascensionists have corroborated the 8C+ grade.
Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.
After a couple of repeats from [Adam Ondra](/climber/467/adam-ondra) and [Nalle Hukkataival](/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival), [Daniel Woods](/climber/516/daniel-woods) and [Dave Graham](/climber/503/dave-graham) came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:
> After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.
> Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.
> The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.
> However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]
After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.
### References
[1] [https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/](https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/)
After
Gioia has a slightly complicated history due to the fragile nature of the rock and the required reinforcements.
After a couple of repeats from [Adam Ondra](/climber/467/adam-ondra) and [Nalle Hukkataival](/climber/602/nalle-hukkataival), [Daniel Woods](/climber/516/daniel-woods) and [Dave Graham](/climber/503/dave-graham) came to try the problem and discovered some new beta using a foothold that appeared after some rock broke. Christian then filled the new hold in to bring the problem back to it's original state. Speaking on facebook, Christian said:
> After Daniel Woods and Dave Graham's attempts at sending Gioia, today I fixed the new foothold which resulted from the accidental breaking off of a piece of rock in a section of the boulder that had never been used before - section 2 of Gioia.
> Now the line is back to its original state, exactly as it was when I first climbed it and when Adam Ondra and Nalle Hukkataival did their repetitions.
> The original footholds are always the same; the new one was frail and would have easily broken again. I never use purpose made glue to fix these kind of issues, it's not a practice I like.
> However, due to its acknowledged importance, Gioia deserved to be restored to its original line so that it could be again equal to every climber who has tried it in the past and will try it in the future. [1]
After this Woods and Graham lost interest in trying the problem.
### References
[1] [https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/](https://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/comments/2yu9kn/after_a_foot_hold_on_gioia_broke_during_attempts/)
Diff
--- before
|
|||||||
| 77378 | 12th February 2026 | 21:51:07 UTC | remus | climb | Snot | crag_location_breadcrumb_pretty | |
|
Before
None
After
<a href="/crags/location/United Kingdom" class="text-muted">United Kingdom</a> / <a href="/crags/location/United Kingdom/England" class="text-muted">England</a> / <a href="/crags/location/United Kingdom/England/South Yorkshire" class="text-muted">South Yorkshire</a> / <a href="/crags/location/United Kingdom/England/South Yorkshire/Sheffield" class="text-muted">Sheffield</a>
|
|||||||
| 77379 | 12th February 2026 | 21:51:07 UTC | remus | climb | Snot | crag_location_breadcrumb | |
|
Before
None
After
United Kingdom / England / South Yorkshire / Sheffield
|
|||||||
| 77380 | 12th February 2026 | 21:51:07 UTC | remus | climb | Snot | crag_name_prefix | |
|
Before
at
After
on the
|
|||||||