remus

	Country	Contributions	Between	Climbers	Crags	Summits	Climbs	Ascents
1	United Kingdom	51671	14th November 2023 – 7th September 2026	1407	695	0	3022	4805
2	USA	24372	14th November 2023 – 7th September 2026	791	179	2	844	2337
3	France	11933	14th November 2023 – 7th September 2026	261	125	1	544	1019
4	Switzerland	9116	14th November 2023 – 6th September 2026	75	42	1	302	1075
5	Spain	8288	15th November 2023 – 3rd September 2026	88	73	0	441	892
6	Italy	4492	16th November 2023 – 4th September 2026	115	58	0	181	347
7	South Africa	3591	16th November 2023 – 30th August 2026	12	35	0	125	390
8	Germany	3074	16th November 2023 – 26th August 2026	115	47	0	102	223
9	Canada	3027	16th November 2023 – 6th September 2026	63	21	3	105	258
10	Austria	2476	16th November 2023 – 29th August 2026	70	26	0	103	218

	Date	Time	User	Type	Name	Attribute
49181	7th January 2026	17:06:42 UTC	remus	ascent	Davide Zane's ascent of Ninjutsu	notes
Before `None` After `### References [1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/DTLl8vrjcxW/](https://www.instagram.com/p/DTLl8vrjcxW/)` Diff `--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ - +### References + +[1] [https://www.instagram.com/p/DTLl8vrjcxW/](https://www.instagram.com/p/DTLl8vrjcxW/)`
49182	7th January 2026	17:06:42 UTC	remus	ascent	Davide Zane's ascent of Ninjutsu	climber_id
Before `None` After `3650`
49183	7th January 2026	17:06:42 UTC	remus	ascent	Davide Zane's ascent of Ninjutsu	climb_id
Before `None` After `3364`
49184	7th January 2026	17:05:58 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	instagram_url
Before `None` After `https://www.instagram.com/ohhhzane/`
49185	7th January 2026	17:05:58 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	ifsc_url
Before `None` After `https://ifsc.results.info/athlete/11504`
49186	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_id
Before `None` After `18`
49187	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	climber_name
Before `None` After `Davide Zane`
49188	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	nationality
Before `None` After `IT`
49189	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	gender
Before `None` After `false`
49190	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_name
Before `None` After `Italy`
49191	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_flag
Before `None` After `🇮🇹`
49192	7th January 2026	17:05:45 UTC	remus	climber	Davide Zane	country_membership
Before `None` After `italian`
49193	7th January 2026	15:29:09 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes
Before [Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. After > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. - [B.C.N](/climber/1240/bernard-newman) Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ -[Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): - > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. -E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. +E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. - [B.C.N](/climber/1240/bernard-newman)
49194	7th January 2026	15:29:09 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes_pretty
Before <p><a href="/climber/1240/bernard-newman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bernard Newman</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h3>British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change?</h3> <p>The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing.</p> <p>However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game.</p> </blockquote> After <blockquote> <h3>British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change?</h3> <p>The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing.</p> <p>However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. - <a href="/climber/1240/bernard-newman" rel="noopener noreferrer">B.C.N</a></p> </blockquote>
49195	7th January 2026	15:28:30 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes
Before `None` After [Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): > ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? > The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. > However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game. Diff --- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,8 @@ - +[Bernard Newman](/climber/1240/bernard-newman): + +> ### British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change? + +> The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing. + +> However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. +E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game.
49196	7th January 2026	15:28:30 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	notes_pretty
Before `None` After <p><a href="/climber/1240/bernard-newman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bernard Newman</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h3>British Rock Climbing Grades - Time For Change?</h3> <p>The advent of totally safe bolt protected climbs on some British limestone crags has called into question the whole issue of grading. Originally, E grades where introduced to subdivide the adjectival Extremely Severe grade which had become overcrowded. Combined with the numerical technical grade, originally conceived to give an objective assessment of the difficulty of the hardest move reduced to ground level, this system seemed ideally suited to British Style climbing.</p> <p>However, on the new sport climbs where all objective dangers have been removed, the difficulty of the hardest move is now assessed numerically in the context of how many difficult moves have proceeded it, thus giving a grade for the overall technical difficulty of the pitch. This is why French grades are applied to such climbs. E grades have become meaningless for this style of climb - effectively linked boulder problems - as has grading for an on sight ascent - these routes are always "worked". Perhaps the time has come to separate "sport" climbing from "real climbing" and end the numbers game.</p> </blockquote>
49197	7th January 2026	15:27:29 UTC	remus	library item	Mountain 134	Contributor
Before `None` After `Al Phizacklea`
49198	7th January 2026	15:26:24 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	Ascent #
Before `None` After `1`
49199	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	ascent_dt_start
Before `None` After `1990-01-01`
49200	7th January 2026	15:26:23 UTC	remus	ascent	Martin Berzins's ascent of Angelheart	ascent_dt_end
Before `None` After `1991-01-01`

Badges

Contributions

Posts

294

4738

7637

189576

170

181

Contributions Map

Contributions by Country

Recent Contributions

< Page 2460 >