remus

Badges

OG100 Contributions1,000 Contributions10,000 Contributions100,000 Contributions10 Posts100 Posts

Contributions

Posts

1 Day

184

7 Days

659

4 Weeks

5488

All Time

223937

Current Streak

234

Longest Streak

234

Contributions Map

Contributions by Country

Country Contributions Between Climbers Crags Summits Climbs Ascents
1 United Kingdom 61467 14th November 2023 – 9th November 2026 1802 711 0 3142 5085
2 USA 25662 14th November 2023 – 10th November 2026 818 182 2 863 2427
3 France 12450 14th November 2023 – 10th November 2026 273 126 1 555 1046
4 Switzerland 9698 14th November 2023 – 9th November 2026 79 43 1 311 1127
5 Spain 8867 15th November 2023 – 9th November 2026 92 76 0 461 932
6 Italy 4984 16th November 2023 – 9th November 2026 120 59 0 192 383
7 South Africa 3688 16th November 2023 – 5th November 2026 12 35 0 128 401
8 Canada 3398 16th November 2023 – 9th November 2026 67 22 3 111 285
9 Germany 3190 16th November 2023 – 27th October 2026 120 48 0 103 225
10 Austria 2659 16th November 2023 – 24th October 2026 76 26 0 105 226

Recent Contributions

Date Time User Type Name Attribute
33621 11th September 2026 12:39:50 UTC remus climb Sturgeon in the Cupboard climb_type_name
Before
None
After
Sport route
33622 11th September 2026 12:39:50 UTC remus climb Sturgeon in the Cupboard grade
Before
None
After
7c+
33623 11th September 2026 12:39:50 UTC remus climb Sturgeon in the Cupboard ukc_url
Before
None
After
https://www.ukclimbing.com/logbook/crags/chee_dale_upper-10865/sturgeon_in_the_cupboard-11800
33624 11th September 2026 12:39:50 UTC remus climb Sturgeon in the Cupboard climb_type
Before
None
After
1
33625 11th September 2026 12:39:50 UTC remus climb Sturgeon in the Cupboard grade_id
Before
None
After
12
33626 11th September 2026 12:39:50 UTC remus climb Sturgeon in the Cupboard climb_name
Before
None
After
Sturgeon in the Cupboard
33627 11th September 2026 12:38:49 UTC remus ascent Nick Dixon's ascent of Turd Burglar notes_pretty
Before
None
After
<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <em>On The Edge</em> Issue 1 (1987) page 7 <a href="/library/16453/on-the-edge-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">/library/16453/on-the-edge-1</a></p>
33628 11th September 2026 12:38:49 UTC remus ascent Nick Dixon's ascent of Turd Burglar notes
Before
None
After
### References [1] *On The Edge* Issue 1 (1987) page 7 [/library/16453/on-the-edge-1](/library/16453/on-the-edge-1)
Diff
--- before

+++ after

@@ -1 +1,3 @@

-
+### References
+
+[1] *On The Edge* Issue 1 (1987) page 7 [/library/16453/on-the-edge-1](/library/16453/on-the-edge-1)
33629 11th September 2026 12:34:50 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 notes_pretty
Before
None
After
<p><a href="/climber/661/ed-douglas" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ed Douglas</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h3>SIGN OF THE TIMES</h3> <p>'It is utterly impossible to persuade an Editor that he is nobody.' – William Hazlitt.</p> <p>Why Hazlitt? Easy, that one. A moment ago I was sitting on my front porch in that tangle of streets squeezed between Rusholme and the Stockport Road, listening to David Bowie saying 'Thank you, thank you,' and hearing the sounds bounce and rattle round the houses like some monstrous, apocalyptic Big Brother taking a bow. Hence Orwell, hence Hazlitt.</p> <p>But back to Apocalypse; 1987, in climbing terms, had 1984 potential. First the exhausting wait for <a href="/list/112/extreme-rock" rel="noopener noreferrer">Extreme Rock</a> ended and leaving aside the inspiring photography and interesting essays, it could have been Diadem's answer to Newspeak. Instead we have the impression that they're a little bewildered by it all. There are no propaganda condemnations of the state of play, no impassioned pleas for calm, just . . . bewilderment.</p> <p>Then there are the proposals from the BMC for assessment of single-pitch rock climbing instructors which admittedly send every self-respecting rock jock into a stupor of indifference but which have been heralded as a fundamental attack on our personal liberty. In reality they turn out to be rather innocuous and even, dare I say it, helpful.</p> <p>Finally we have those twin sisters of Beelzebub, competitions and bolts, bearing down on us threatening utter destruction, but which seem to remain largely south of Paris. So where's the worry?</p> <p>Before you roar your disapproval at my apparent indifference and reach for your pens, I'll finish what I've started.</p> <p>During last autumn, a certain magazine editor claimed that British rock climbing was dead, that my generation had destroyed 'that fragile flower' and that we might as well all go and live in <a href="/crag/2006/buoux" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buoux</a>. Ignoring for the moment the arrogance of the idea that the past is perfect and the present rotten, I find from personal experience and from talking to people who still bother to climb that British climbing is fit and well and living in Hope Street.</p> <p>That is not to say that everything is in good order. Of course competitions are a sinister and frightening and real possibility and they need fighting tooth and nail. Of course bolting could castrate our climbing tradition but giving up the fight by not representing the views of those who are pushing back the barriers now, in 1987 and not 1977 or 1967, is hardly a step in the right direction. We need a medium at the front line not generals ten miles behind the trenches. We need purpose. We need direction. Welcome to On The Edge.</p> </blockquote>
33630 11th September 2026 12:34:50 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 notes
Before
None
After
[Ed Douglas](/climber/661/ed-douglas): > ### SIGN OF THE TIMES > 'It is utterly impossible to persuade an Editor that he is nobody.' – William Hazlitt. > Why Hazlitt? Easy, that one. A moment ago I was sitting on my front porch in that tangle of streets squeezed between Rusholme and the Stockport Road, listening to David Bowie saying 'Thank you, thank you,' and hearing the sounds bounce and rattle round the houses like some monstrous, apocalyptic Big Brother taking a bow. Hence Orwell, hence Hazlitt. > But back to Apocalypse; 1987, in climbing terms, had 1984 potential. First the exhausting wait for [Extreme Rock](/list/112/extreme-rock) ended and leaving aside the inspiring photography and interesting essays, it could have been Diadem's answer to Newspeak. Instead we have the impression that they're a little bewildered by it all. There are no propaganda condemnations of the state of play, no impassioned pleas for calm, just . . . bewilderment. > Then there are the proposals from the BMC for assessment of single-pitch rock climbing instructors which admittedly send every self-respecting rock jock into a stupor of indifference but which have been heralded as a fundamental attack on our personal liberty. In reality they turn out to be rather innocuous and even, dare I say it, helpful. > Finally we have those twin sisters of Beelzebub, competitions and bolts, bearing down on us threatening utter destruction, but which seem to remain largely south of Paris. So where's the worry? > Before you roar your disapproval at my apparent indifference and reach for your pens, I'll finish what I've started. > During last autumn, a certain magazine editor claimed that British rock climbing was dead, that my generation had destroyed 'that fragile flower' and that we might as well all go and live in [Buoux](/crag/2006/buoux). Ignoring for the moment the arrogance of the idea that the past is perfect and the present rotten, I find from personal experience and from talking to people who still bother to climb that British climbing is fit and well and living in Hope Street. > That is not to say that everything is in good order. Of course competitions are a sinister and frightening and real possibility and they need fighting tooth and nail. Of course bolting could castrate our climbing tradition but giving up the fight by not representing the views of those who are pushing back the barriers now, in 1987 and not 1977 or 1967, is hardly a step in the right direction. We need a medium at the front line not generals ten miles behind the trenches. We need purpose. We need direction. Welcome to On The Edge.
Diff
--- before

+++ after

@@ -1 +1,19 @@

-
+[Ed Douglas](/climber/661/ed-douglas):
+
+> ### SIGN OF THE TIMES
+
+> 'It is utterly impossible to persuade an Editor that he is nobody.' – William Hazlitt.
+
+> Why Hazlitt? Easy, that one. A moment ago I was sitting on my front porch in that tangle of streets squeezed between Rusholme and the Stockport Road, listening to David Bowie saying 'Thank you, thank you,' and hearing the sounds bounce and rattle round the houses like some monstrous, apocalyptic Big Brother taking a bow. Hence Orwell, hence Hazlitt.
+
+> But back to Apocalypse; 1987, in climbing terms, had 1984 potential. First the exhausting wait for [Extreme Rock](/list/112/extreme-rock) ended and leaving aside the inspiring photography and interesting essays, it could have been Diadem's answer to Newspeak. Instead we have the impression that they're a little bewildered by it all. There are no propaganda condemnations of the state of play, no impassioned pleas for calm, just . . . bewilderment.
+
+> Then there are the proposals from the BMC for assessment of single-pitch rock climbing instructors which admittedly send every self-respecting rock jock into a stupor of indifference but which have been heralded as a fundamental attack on our personal liberty. In reality they turn out to be rather innocuous and even, dare I say it, helpful.
+
+> Finally we have those twin sisters of Beelzebub, competitions and bolts, bearing down on us threatening utter destruction, but which seem to remain largely south of Paris. So where's the worry?
+
+> Before you roar your disapproval at my apparent indifference and reach for your pens, I'll finish what I've started.
+
+> During last autumn, a certain magazine editor claimed that British rock climbing was dead, that my generation had destroyed 'that fragile flower' and that we might as well all go and live in [Buoux](/crag/2006/buoux). Ignoring for the moment the arrogance of the idea that the past is perfect and the present rotten, I find from personal experience and from talking to people who still bother to climb that British climbing is fit and well and living in Hope Street.
+
+> That is not to say that everything is in good order. Of course competitions are a sinister and frightening and real possibility and they need fighting tooth and nail. Of course bolting could castrate our climbing tradition but giving up the fight by not representing the views of those who are pushing back the barriers now, in 1987 and not 1977 or 1967, is hardly a step in the right direction. We need a medium at the front line not generals ten miles behind the trenches. We need purpose. We need direction. Welcome to On The Edge.
33631 11th September 2026 12:30:42 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 Crag Features
Before
None
After
598
33632 11th September 2026 12:30:24 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 Crag Features
Before
None
After
31
33633 11th September 2026 12:30:17 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 Contributor
Before
None
After
Martin Crocker
33634 11th September 2026 12:30:11 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 Contributor
Before
None
After
Johnny Dawes
33635 11th September 2026 12:29:59 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 Features
Before
None
After
Ed Drummond
33636 11th September 2026 12:29:49 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 Contributor
Before
None
After
Gary Gibson
33637 11th September 2026 12:29:27 UTC remus library item On The Edge 1 News Editor
Before
None
After
Bill McKee
33638 11th September 2026 12:26:39 UTC remus climber Bill McKee date_of_death_pretty
Before
None
After
33639 11th September 2026 12:26:39 UTC remus climber Bill McKee date_of_birth_pretty
Before
None
After
33640 11th September 2026 12:26:39 UTC remus climber Bill McKee country_flag
Before
None
After
🇬🇧

< Page 1682 >