| Date | Time | User | Type | Name | Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18th November 2024 | 07:57:53 | remus | - | - | youtube_url | |
|
Before
None
After
https://www.youtube.com/@alexisperry4054
|
|||||||
| 2 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | climber_id | |
|
Before
None
After
240
|
|||||||
| 3 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | climb_id | |
|
Before
None
After
4154
|
|||||||
| 4 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | fa | |
|
Before
false
After
true
|
|||||||
| 5 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | ascent_style_id | |
|
Before
None
After
4
|
|||||||
| 6 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | notes | |
|
Before
None
After
### References
[1] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBcfBaJeWIg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBcfBaJeWIg)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
-
+### References
+
+[1] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBcfBaJeWIg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBcfBaJeWIg)
|
|||||||
| 7 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
None
After
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBcfBaJeWIg">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBcfBaJeWIg</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 8 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | ascent_type_id | |
|
Before
None
After
4
|
|||||||
| 9 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | ascent_dt_start | |
|
Before
None
After
2021-08-22
|
|||||||
| 10 | 18th November 2024 | 07:48:08 | remus | ascent | Steve | ascent_dt_end | |
|
Before
None
After
2021-08-22
|
|||||||
| 11 | 18th November 2024 | 07:39:22 | remus | ascent | The Death Star | notes | |
|
Before
The line is eliminate and the grade depends on the sequence used. I'm not clear exactly how the line was climbed.
After
> Same approximate sequence as [[Tom] Newberry](/climber/178/tom-newberry) and [Ellis [Butler-Barker]](/climber/168/ellis-butler-barker) - via the rejecting slot and mono. I have no authority nor experience to suggest what grade this is, climbed in this manner. Absolutely understand why [Chris S](/climber/164/chris-savage) went totally direct; good to be beyond scrutiny on a FA. Whatever way this route is climbed, it is really, really good ([Ian's](/climber/241/ian-cooper) sequence is proper good too). Engaging moves and a proper test of power endurance on excellent rock.
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1 +1 @@
-The line is eliminate and the grade depends on the sequence used. I'm not clear exactly how the line was climbed.
+> Same approximate sequence as [[Tom] Newberry](/climber/178/tom-newberry) and [Ellis [Butler-Barker]](/climber/168/ellis-butler-barker) - via the rejecting slot and mono. I have no authority nor experience to suggest what grade this is, climbed in this manner. Absolutely understand why [Chris S](/climber/164/chris-savage) went totally direct; good to be beyond scrutiny on a FA. Whatever way this route is climbed, it is really, really good ([Ian's](/climber/241/ian-cooper) sequence is proper good too). Engaging moves and a proper test of power endurance on excellent rock.
|
|||||||
| 12 | 18th November 2024 | 07:39:22 | remus | ascent | The Death Star | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>The line is eliminate and the grade depends on the sequence used. I'm not clear exactly how the line was climbed.</p>
After
<blockquote>
<p>Same approximate sequence as <a href="/climber/178/tom-newberry">[Tom] Newberry</a> and <a href="/climber/168/ellis-butler-barker">Ellis [Butler-Barker]</a> - via the rejecting slot and mono. I have no authority nor experience to suggest what grade this is, climbed in this manner. Absolutely understand why <a href="/climber/164/chris-savage">Chris S</a> went totally direct; good to be beyond scrutiny on a FA. Whatever way this route is climbed, it is really, really good (<a href="/climber/241/ian-cooper">Ian's</a> sequence is proper good too). Engaging moves and a proper test of power endurance on excellent rock.</p>
</blockquote>
|
|||||||
| 13 | 18th November 2024 | 07:36:09 | remus | - | - | ukc_url | |
|
Before
None
After
https://www.ukclimbing.com/logbook/showlog.php?id=105746
|
|||||||
| 14 | 5th November 2024 | 21:22:00 | remus | ascent | Son of Satan | ascent_dt_start | |
|
Before
None
After
2011-08-18
|
|||||||
| 15 | 5th November 2024 | 21:22:00 | remus | ascent | Son of Satan | climber_id | |
|
Before
None
After
240
|
|||||||
| 16 | 5th November 2024 | 21:22:00 | remus | ascent | Son of Satan | ascent_dt_end | |
|
Before
None
After
2011-08-18
|
|||||||
| 17 | 5th November 2024 | 21:22:00 | remus | ascent | Son of Satan | climb_id | |
|
Before
None
After
4104
|
|||||||
| 18 | 5th November 2024 | 21:22:00 | remus | ascent | Son of Satan | ascent_style_id | |
|
Before
None
After
1
|
|||||||
| 19 | 5th November 2024 | 21:22:00 | remus | ascent | Son of Satan | ascent_type_id | |
|
Before
None
After
1
|
|||||||