Change Log for Gaskins' Problem

Overview

Total Changes

21

First Change

16th Feb 2021

Last Change

30th Jun 2024

Log

Date Time User Type Name Attribute
1 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts ascent_dt_end
Before
None
After
2025-01-01
2 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts climber_id
Before
None
After
227
3 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts climb_id
Before
None
After
416
4 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts ascent_style_id
Before
None
After
5
5 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts notes
Before
None
After
### References [1] [https://www.patreon.com/posts/trying-worlds-8a-107179471](https://www.patreon.com/posts/trying-worlds-8a-107179471)
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ - +### References + +[1] [https://www.patreon.com/posts/trying-worlds-8a-107179471](https://www.patreon.com/posts/trying-worlds-8a-107179471)
6 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts notes_pretty
Before
None
After
<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="https://www.patreon.com/posts/trying-worlds-8a-107179471">https://www.patreon.com/posts/trying-worlds-8a-107179471</a></p>
7 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts ascent_type_id
Before
None
After
2
8 30th June 2024 20:13:08 remus ascent Aidan Roberts ascent_dt_start
Before
None
After
2024-01-01
9 17th June 2024 12:56:53 remus ascent Chris Davies climber_id
Before
None
After
281
10 17th June 2024 12:56:53 remus ascent Chris Davies climb_id
Before
None
After
416
11 17th June 2024 12:56:53 remus ascent Chris Davies ascent_style_id
Before
None
After
5
12 17th June 2024 12:56:53 remus ascent Chris Davies ascent_type_id
Before
None
After
2
13 15th April 2024 13:11:43 remus ascent John Gaskins notes
Before
[http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141](http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141)
After
### References [1] [http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141](http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141)
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1,3 @@ -[http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141](http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141) +### References + +[1] [http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141](http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141)
14 15th April 2024 13:11:43 remus ascent John Gaskins notes_pretty
Before
<p><a href="http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141">http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141</a></p>
After
<h3>References</h3> <p>[1] <a href="http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141">http://www.northwalesbouldering.com/newsitem.asp?nsid=141</a></p>
15 21st January 2024 10:00:49 remus - - grade_approx
Before
false
After
true
16 21st January 2024 10:00:32 remus ascent John Gaskins suggested_grade_id
Before
None
After
176
17 21st January 2024 10:00:13 remus - - exclude_reason_pretty
Before
<p>Probably unclimbed. Initially a grade of 8A+/B was suggested but no one has been able to repeat it despite many attempts from strong suitors. The discrepancy between the proposed difficulty and the actual difficulty, combined with Gaskin's history of unsubstantiated ascents suggest this one is another figment of his imagination.</p>
After
<p>Probably unclimbed. Initially a grade of 8A+/B was suggested but no one has been able to repeat it despite many attempts from strong suitors. The discrepancy between the proposed difficulty and the actual difficulty, combined with Gaskin's history of unsubstantiated ascents suggest this one is unlikely to be possible at the proposed grade.</p>
18 21st January 2024 10:00:13 remus - - exclude_reason
Before
Probably unclimbed. Initially a grade of 8A+/B was suggested but no one has been able to repeat it despite many attempts from strong suitors. The discrepancy between the proposed difficulty and the actual difficulty, combined with Gaskin's history of unsubstantiated ascents suggest this one is another figment of his imagination.
After
Probably unclimbed. Initially a grade of 8A+/B was suggested but no one has been able to repeat it despite many attempts from strong suitors. The discrepancy between the proposed difficulty and the actual difficulty, combined with Gaskin's history of unsubstantiated ascents suggest this one is unlikely to be possible at the proposed grade.
Diff
--- before +++ after @@ -1 +1 @@ -Probably unclimbed. Initially a grade of 8A+/B was suggested but no one has been able to repeat it despite many attempts from strong suitors. The discrepancy between the proposed difficulty and the actual difficulty, combined with Gaskin's history of unsubstantiated ascents suggest this one is another figment of his imagination. +Probably unclimbed. Initially a grade of 8A+/B was suggested but no one has been able to repeat it despite many attempts from strong suitors. The discrepancy between the proposed difficulty and the actual difficulty, combined with Gaskin's history of unsubstantiated ascents suggest this one is unlikely to be possible at the proposed grade.
19 1st November 2021 21:15:57 remus - - -
Before
None
After
None
20 16th February 2021 14:46:07 remus - - -
Before
None
After
None

Page 1 >