| Date | Time | User | Type | Name | Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | climber_id | |
|
Before
None
After
166
|
|||||||
| 2 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | ascent_dt_end | |
|
Before
None
After
2025-01-01
|
|||||||
| 3 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | ascent_dt_start | |
|
Before
None
After
2024-01-01
|
|||||||
| 4 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | ascent_type_id | |
|
Before
None
After
2
|
|||||||
| 5 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
None
After
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3MltLV3bV8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3MltLV3bV8</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 6 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | notes | |
|
Before
None
After
### References
[1] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3MltLV3bV8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3MltLV3bV8)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
-
+### References
+
+[1] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3MltLV3bV8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3MltLV3bV8)
|
|||||||
| 7 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | ascent_style_id | |
|
Before
None
After
5
|
|||||||
| 8 | 18th November 2024 | 19:26:06 | remus | ascent | Pete Whittaker | climb_id | |
|
Before
None
After
2845
|
|||||||
| 9 | 24th July 2024 | 06:36:27 | remus | ascent | Charles Albert | notes | |
|
Before
Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].
### References
[1] [https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve](https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve)
[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
[4] [https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large](https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large)
After
Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].
### References
[1] [https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve](https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve)
[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
[4] [https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large](https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large)
[5] [https://www.grimper.com/news-ombre-voyageur-charles-albert-conquete-absurde](https://www.grimper.com/news-ombre-voyageur-charles-albert-conquete-absurde)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -8,4 +8,6 @@
[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
-[4] [https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large](https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large)
+[4] [https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large](https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large)
+
+[5] [https://www.grimper.com/news-ombre-voyageur-charles-albert-conquete-absurde](https://www.grimper.com/news-ombre-voyageur-charles-albert-conquete-absurde)
|
|||||||
| 10 | 24th July 2024 | 06:36:27 | remus | ascent | Charles Albert | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve">https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve</a></p>
<p>[2] Video from a previous attempt <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/">https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/">https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/</a></p>
<p>[4] <a href="https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large">https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large</a></p>
After
<p>Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve">https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve</a></p>
<p>[2] Video from a previous attempt <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/">https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/">https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/</a></p>
<p>[4] <a href="https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large">https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large</a></p>
<p>[5] <a href="https://www.grimper.com/news-ombre-voyageur-charles-albert-conquete-absurde">https://www.grimper.com/news-ombre-voyageur-charles-albert-conquete-absurde</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 11 | 28th April 2024 | 07:24:15 | remus | - | - | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p><em>L’Ombre du Voyageur</em> is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in <a href="/crag/8647/le-saleve">Le Salève</a>, near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.</p>
<p>The line was first spotted by <a href="/climber/542/elie-chevieux">Elie Chevieux</a>, but it had to wait until <a href="/climber/600/charles-albert">Charles Albert</a> started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.</p>
After
<p><em>L’Ombre du Voyageur</em> is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in <a href="/crag/8647/le-saleve">Le Salève</a>, near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.</p>
<p>The line was first spotted by <a href="/climber/542/elie-chevieux">Elie Chevieux</a>, but it had to wait until <a href="/climber/600/charles-albert">Charles Albert</a> started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://maps.app.goo.gl/Eij35BemenXwim5e8">https://maps.app.goo.gl/Eij35BemenXwim5e8</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 12 | 28th April 2024 | 07:24:15 | remus | - | - | notes | |
|
Before
*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Salève](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
After
*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Salève](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
### References
[1] [https://maps.app.goo.gl/Eij35BemenXwim5e8](https://maps.app.goo.gl/Eij35BemenXwim5e8)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Salève](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
-The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
+The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
+
+### References
+
+[1] [https://maps.app.goo.gl/Eij35BemenXwim5e8](https://maps.app.goo.gl/Eij35BemenXwim5e8)
|
|||||||
| 13 | 28th April 2024 | 07:11:09 | remus | - | - | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p><em>L’Ombre du Voyageur</em> is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in <a href="/crag/8647/le-saleve">Le Saleve</a>, near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.</p>
<p>The line was first spotted by <a href="/climber/542/elie-chevieux">Elie Chevieux</a>, but it had to wait until <a href="/climber/600/charles-albert">Charles Albert</a> started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.</p>
After
<p><em>L’Ombre du Voyageur</em> is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in <a href="/crag/8647/le-saleve">Le Salève</a>, near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.</p>
<p>The line was first spotted by <a href="/climber/542/elie-chevieux">Elie Chevieux</a>, but it had to wait until <a href="/climber/600/charles-albert">Charles Albert</a> started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.</p>
|
|||||||
| 14 | 28th April 2024 | 07:11:09 | remus | - | - | notes | |
|
Before
*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Saleve](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
After
*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Salève](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Saleve](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
+*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Salève](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
|
|||||||
| 15 | 28th April 2024 | 07:10:21 | remus | - | - | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>The line was first spotted by <a href="/climber/542/elie-chevieux">Elie Chevieux</a>, but it had to wait until <a href="/climber/600/charles-albert">Charles Albert</a> started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.</p>
After
<p><em>L’Ombre du Voyageur</em> is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in <a href="/crag/8647/le-saleve">Le Saleve</a>, near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.</p>
<p>The line was first spotted by <a href="/climber/542/elie-chevieux">Elie Chevieux</a>, but it had to wait until <a href="/climber/600/charles-albert">Charles Albert</a> started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.</p>
|
|||||||
| 16 | 28th April 2024 | 07:10:21 | remus | - | - | notes | |
|
Before
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
After
*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Saleve](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
+*L’Ombre du Voyageur* is a roof crack boulder problem in a cave in [Le Saleve](/crag/8647/le-saleve), near Geneva. The first half of the problem is the hardest section before you reach a slight rest hanging from a single handjam, and then the easier end section.
+
The line was first spotted by [Elie Chevieux](/climber/542/elie-chevieux), but it had to wait until [Charles Albert](/climber/600/charles-albert) started working the line around 2019 until it would then see a first ascent in 2023.
|
|||||||
| 17 | 28th April 2024 | 06:54:19 | remus | ascent | Charles Albert | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve">https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve</a></p>
<p>[2] Video from a previous attempt <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/">https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/">https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/</a></p>
After
<p>Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve">https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve</a></p>
<p>[2] Video from a previous attempt <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/">https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/">https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/</a></p>
<p>[4] <a href="https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large">https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large</a></p>
|
|||||||
| 18 | 28th April 2024 | 06:54:19 | remus | ascent | Charles Albert | notes | |
|
Before
Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].
### References
[1] [https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve](https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve)
[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
After
Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].
### References
[1] [https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve](https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve)
[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
[4] [https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large](https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -6,4 +6,6 @@
[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
-[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
+[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
+
+[4] [https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large](https://watch.reelrocktour.com/featured/videos/charles-at-large)
|
|||||||
| 19 | 22nd November 2023 | 16:16:33 | remus | ascent | Charles Albert | notes | |
|
Before
Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].
### References
[1] [https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve](https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve)
[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
After
Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].
### References
[1] [https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve](https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve)
[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
Diff
--- before
+++ after
@@ -4,4 +4,6 @@
[1] [https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve](https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve)
-[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
+[2] Video from a previous attempt [https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/)
+
+[3] [https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/](https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/)
|
|||||||
| 20 | 22nd November 2023 | 16:16:33 | remus | ascent | Charles Albert | notes_pretty | |
|
Before
<p>Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve">https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve</a></p>
<p>[2] Video from a previous attempt <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/">https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/</a></p>
After
<p>Charles struggled to grade the problem due to it's length (being more like a route) and because he climbed it barefoot and without kneepads, as is his preferred style. He suggested that for him it was maybe approaching 9A+, but that shoes and knee pads would almost certainly make it substantially easier. Even so, he felt 8C+ would be too harsh and so settled on 9A. [1, via google translate].</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[1] <a href="https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve">https://www.grimper.com/news-charles-albert-libere-9a-bloc-saleve</a></p>
<p>[2] Video from a previous attempt <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/">https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsWcuwBgFwg/</a></p>
<p>[3] <a href="https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/">https://www.climbing.com/news/charles-albert-climbs-new-v17-boulder/</a></p>
|
|||||||